# What the 2026-27 Queensland Budget puts toward new housing supply

The State Budget handed down on 23 June backs trunk infrastructure, a new activation fund and social housing. A plain account of the supply measures and their scale.

---


The Queensland Budget for 2026-27 was handed down on Tuesday 23 June 2026, and its housing supply measures lean heavily on infrastructure, with little in the way of new planning rules. A Queensland Government media statement issued that afternoon confirms that the next round of the Residential Activation Fund is doubled from $500 million to $1 billion, and that $50 million is committed in 2026-27 as part of more than $2 billion in joint State and Commonwealth funding.

The Planning Institute of Australia published a line-by-line response on 24 June, which fills in several of the smaller items. The Budget's own Service Delivery Statement for the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning adds the targets the department has set itself.

<div class="keyfacts">
<div><b>$1b</b><span>for the next Residential Activation Fund round</span></div>
<div><b>51,000</b><span>homes tied to the joint infrastructure funding</span></div>
<div><b>$5.725b</b><span>for social and community housing, four years</span></div>
</div>
<p class="src">Queensland Government media statement, 23 June 2026; Planning Institute of Australia response to the Budget, 24 June 2026.</p>

## The supply measures

The measures fall into three groups: money for pipes and roads, money for planning itself, and money for social and community housing.

<figure class="fig"><figcaption><b>Housing supply items in the 2026-27 Budget</b><span>As reported on 23 and 24 June 2026</span></figcaption>
<div class="scroll"><table class="tbl">
<thead><tr><th>Measure</th><th>Amount</th><th>Reported by</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td>Residential Activation Fund, next round</td><td>$1 billion, doubled from $500 million</td><td>Queensland Government</td></tr>
<tr><td>Joint State and Commonwealth trunk infrastructure funding</td><td>More than $2 billion; $50 million in 2026-27</td><td>Queensland Government</td></tr>
<tr><td>Infrastructure Activation Fund</td><td>$200 million over four years</td><td>Planning Institute of Australia</td></tr>
<tr><td>Social and community housing</td><td>$5.725 billion over four years</td><td>Planning Institute of Australia</td></tr>
<tr><td>Planning commitments</td><td>$8.1 million over five years</td><td>Planning Institute of Australia</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
<p class="src">Queensland Government media statement, 23 June 2026; Planning Institute of Australia response to the Budget, 24 June 2026.</p></figure>

The doubling of the Residential Activation Fund round was announced nine days before the Budget, on 14 June, so it is confirmed here, not new. The fund totals $2 billion and pays councils and developers for trunk infrastructure such as water mains, sewers and roads. The Service Delivery Statement repeats the rule that at least 50 per cent of it is to be invested in regional, rural and remote Queensland.

The joint funding is the larger long-run commitment. The Government statement says it is intended to unlock more than 51,000 homes, of which more than 20,000 are to be exclusively for first home buyers, by fast-tracking new trunk infrastructure in Priority Development Areas, the districts where the State takes over planning from councils. The $50 million committed in 2026-27 is 2.5 per cent of $2 billion, which shows how far the spending is spread across later years.

## Two activation funds, two jobs

The Budget now carries two funds with similar names, and they do different work.

The Residential Activation Fund is a grants program. Councils and developers apply in rounds, and the State pays for a named piece of infrastructure. Its second round drew 209 submissions, according to the 14 June statement.

The Infrastructure Activation Fund is the vehicle for the joint funding with the Commonwealth, and it sits with Economic Development Queensland, the State's development agency. The Service Delivery Statement describes it as a joint investment to unlock sites for more than 51,000 homes, including more than 20,500 for first home buyers. It puts the department's own funding at $201.9 million over four years and says the partnership could bring infrastructure investment of up to a further $2.4 billion.

The Planning Institute's summary gives the State's share as $200 million over four years, and adds that it has the potential to secure up to an additional $2 billion from the Federal Government. The accounting firm BDO, in a Budget commentary published on 26 June, puts the total matched contribution at $399 million. The figures are close and not identical, and each is given here as its source states it.

<div class="callout"><span class="mono">Figures differ</span><h4>The Land Activation Program has two published amounts</h4>
<p>The Government statement of 23 June says the program, which releases underused government land for housing, is expanded with $27.1 million. The Planning Institute's summary lists $15 million over two years. The two may cover different periods; neither source reconciles them.</p>
</div>

One figure in the Service Delivery Statement is the most direct measure of what the department expects to approve. Economic Development Queensland's target for 2026-27 is 5,934 dwellings approved in Priority Development Areas, against an estimated 9,406 in 2025-26. The service standard for speed is that 90 per cent of development applications are decided within 38 business days. The statement gives the two numbers without commentary. Approvals in these areas arrive in large, uneven blocks, so a single year's result is a loose guide to the next.

## How big is the housing envelope

The Adviser, a mortgage industry publication, reported on 25 June that the Budget allocates $12.3 billion across housing. That total covers far more than new supply: social housing and buyer assistance are both inside it.

The Planning Institute's figures show where much of it goes. Social and community housing takes $5.725 billion over four years from 2026-27, tied to the Government's target of 53,500 social and community homes by 2044. The Institute also lists $487.3 million over five years toward that target. BDO's commentary says 6,500 of those homes are under way.

Buyer assistance is the other large block. The Queensland Revenue Office confirmed on Budget day that the $30,000 First Home Owner Grant continues for eligible contracts signed from 1 July 2026. PRD Research, in a Budget summary dated 23 June, says the grant is extended for four years with $72 million allocated, and that the Boost to Buy shared equity scheme continues with $330 million and is expected to help about 2,000 buyers. The Revenue Office also flagged a change on the other side of the ledger: from 1 August 2026, transfer duty home concessions are limited to Australian citizens, permanent residents and specified foreign retirees.

For private housing, the Budget's approach is indirect. It does not build homes or buy land at scale. It pays for the infrastructure that lets privately owned land be developed, and it funds the planning work behind that.

## The planning line items

The smallest numbers in the table may matter as much as the largest for anyone waiting on a development approval. The Planning Institute reports $8.1 million over five years, plus $1.6 million a year ongoing, for planning commitments that include a review of infrastructure planning and the implementation of State Planning Policy changes.

The Institute's list has other items that bear on where homes will go. The Gabba Entertainment and Housing Precinct in Brisbane receives $45.6 million over two years. Economic Development Queensland receives $25 million over three years to prepare a university campus site in North Rockhampton. On transport, the Institute notes $5.5 billion across three stages for The Wave, the rail project on the Sunshine Coast, and $5.75 billion for Logan and Gold Coast Faster Rail.

PRD Research puts the whole four-year capital program at $119.241 billion, a figure that takes in hospitals, energy and roads as well as housing.

## What the institutions said

The Planning Institute welcomed what it called the Budget's continued focus on housing delivery, infrastructure activation and planning system reform, and said it would take part in the reviews the Budget funds.

The Property Council of Australia, in a response on Budget day, welcomed the doubled Residential Activation Fund round, the new Infrastructure Activation Fund, the extended First Home Owner Grant and a $163 million expansion of Boost to Buy. Its concern was with investment settings. It said Queensland risked losing private capital to other states, pointed to more competitive rules in New South Wales for foreign investment in build-to-rent and retirement living, and asked for more support for modern methods of construction. It also noted the sector's contribution to the Budget itself: $11.5 billion in property taxes in 2026-27, or 38.8 per cent of all State taxes, compared with $6.95 billion from coal royalties.

The Adviser reported a real estate industry view that the Government had missed a chance to extend the First Home Owner Grant to established homes and to take on wider transfer duty reform.

BDO's commentary supplied the context most relevant to supply. It says Queensland accounts for more than 25 per cent of national population growth and less than 20 per cent of dwelling completions.

## What the Budget does not settle

Money for infrastructure answers one of the constraints on new housing. It does not, by itself, supply the trades to build the houses that connect to a funded sewer main, or the finance for the projects that follow. The Reserve Bank left the cash rate target at 4.35 per cent on 16 June, a week before the Budget, after raising it in May, according to the Western Australian Treasury Corporation's summaries of both decisions.

The timing is also long. Trunk infrastructure funded this year is designed, tendered and built over several years before lots are serviced. The Government's own target is one million homes by 2044, an 18-year horizon from this Budget.

The next markers are administrative. Legislation for the revenue measures has to pass, and the Queensland Revenue Office says it will publish detail after assent. Successful projects in the doubled Residential Activation Fund round, and the first allocations from the joint funding, have not yet been named. Which estates receive the money will be known only then.
