In this article

Kooky
Builder of Shaka, the payment router that pays every agent their commission on closing date.
About Kooky and Shaka →Queensland's social housing register held 44,294 people in July 2026, the ABC reported on 19 August. That is fewer than the 48,539 recorded in October 2024, and well below a peak the broadcaster puts at more than 59,000 in November 2025.
The register is the list of people who have applied for, and been found eligible for, public or community housing and are waiting for a home. It is one of the few regular counts of unmet need at the lowest-income end of the rental market.
Register figures as reported by ABC News, 19 August 2026. The 2044 target is the Queensland Government's.
How far the count has moved
Against October 2024, the July figure is lower by 4,245 people, or about 8.7 per cent. Against the November 2025 peak the fall is larger. Measured from 59,000 it is about 14,700 people, close to a quarter; the ABC, which gives the peak only as more than 59,000, describes the drop as more than 20 per cent.
The ABC's own earlier reporting fills in the path between those points. On 30 October 2025 it reported that the register had grown to a record of more than 56,000 people, and cited government data from August of that year showing 53,874. The count therefore rose by more than 10,000 in the thirteen months after October 2024 before turning.
| Month | People | Reported by the ABC on |
|---|---|---|
| October 2024 | 48,539 | 19 August 2026 |
| August 2025 | 53,874 | 30 October 2025 |
| October 2025 | More than 56,000 | 30 October 2025 |
| November 2025 | More than 59,000 | 19 August 2026 |
| July 2026 | 44,294 | 19 August 2026 |
ABC News reports of 30 October 2025 and 19 August 2026. The two October and November 2025 figures were published as rounded minimums.
The speed of the fall is the striking part of that series. Between November 2025 and July 2026, eight months, the list shortened by roughly 14,700 people. A fall that fast is why the explanation matters as much as the figure.
Two reasons, different in kind
According to the ABC's report, the Housing Minister attributed the decline to two things, a more actively managed list and more homes coming online, and said the direction was right while the job was not finished. The two causes are different in kind. A new home takes a household off the register by housing it. Active management removes entries that no longer qualify or no longer respond, which lowers the count without adding a dwelling.
Related readRTA backs a campaign on home modifications in rental propertiesBoth have been under way. On housing, a Queensland Government statement of 23 July said almost 5,300 households were assisted into social housing during 2025-26. On management of the existing stock, the ABC reported on 29 July the results of the first full year of tenancy reviews, a framework the government announced in June 2025. The reviews covered 46,210 households in public housing during 2025-26. Of those, 359 left, among them 76 that owned property or earned more than the $80,000 income limit, fewer than 1 per cent of the households reviewed, and 211 that did not supply the information requested within 28 days.
The same report recorded effects that ran in the tenants' favour. Rents were reduced for 3,709 households found to be paying more than 25 per cent of their income, and 267 households chose to move to smaller homes, which freed 401 bedrooms for larger families. A home vacated after a review, or a larger home released by a household that downsizes, becomes available to someone on the register.
Those review figures concern people already housed. Neither ABC report gives a number for how many names left the waiting list through checks on applicants, as opposed to through an offer of a home. That is the part of the fall the published figures do not break down.
On supply, the government's stated target is 53,500 social and community homes by 2044. The 23 July statement said 6,925 social and affordable homes were under way across the state, that 4,469 had been delivered, and that the investment in new social and community homes stands at $5.7 billion. It added that more than 35,500 households were receiving help to stay in the private rental market. The ABC reports that the minister declined to commit to a specific figure for reducing the register.
Related readRTA's 2026-27 compliance plan begins with bond claim evidenceTwo sets of figures
A reader comparing sources will find numbers that do not match. The government's 23 July statement put the register at 41,298 people on what it called the latest July figures, said that was 3,682 fewer than when it came to office, and described a peak of almost 44,980 under the previous government. The Real Estate Institute of Queensland quoted the same 41,298 in its June quarter vacancy report on 30 July.
The ABC's figures, published four weeks later, are higher at each point: 44,294 for July 2026 and 48,539 for October 2024. Neither the statement nor the ABC report explains the difference, and the two series should not be mixed. Each is consistent with itself. The government's two numbers differ by 3,682 people and the ABC's by 4,245, so both describe a register that is lower than in October 2024, by between 8 and 9 per cent.
Part of the difficulty is that the register can be counted in more than one way. The Department of Housing and Public Works publishes it as open data, described as the details of applications for social housing at a specified date, including the type of assistance required, the application date and the level of assessed need. An application covers a household, and a household can be one person or several. When the Queensland Council of Social Service analysed the register in September 2022, it counted 45,958 people in 27,437 households. The department's notes add that an applicant's location is recorded by first preference, not current address, and that a change of systems in 2019-20 affects comparisons across years.
Related readRTA publishes plain-language guides for residential servicesNone of that makes either July figure wrong. It does mean that any register number needs its unit, its date and its source beside it, and that a movement should be read within one series.
Who the register does not count
The response from the housing sector, as reported by the ABC, was less about the number than about its edges. Q Shelter, the peak body for housing and homelessness organisations in Queensland, said the register gives an incomplete picture because its income limits leave out many renters who are struggling in the private market, a group it calls the missing middle.
The ABC cites the thresholds involved: an $80,000 income cap for households already in social housing, and weekly income limits for new applicants of $609 for a single person with no children and $755 for a couple. A household earning just above the applicant limit is not eligible, is not on the register and is renting privately, whatever share of its income the rent takes.
Q Shelter's proposals, according to the report, are for more specific goals than a single statewide total: targets for supportive housing for people with high needs, dedicated targets for affordable housing, including discounted rentals, and homes located near transport, services and jobs. The organisation also raised a concern that some residents were being housed in outlying areas with fewer services and less work.
A shorter register shows fewer eligible people waiting. It does not show how many renters sit just above the line.
Why it matters for the wider rental market
Social housing and the private rental market draw on the same pool of households at the margin. The private market those households are renting in remains tight by the industry's own measure: the Real Estate Institute of Queensland's June quarter report put the statewide vacancy rate at 1.0 per cent, with 29 of 50 regions at 1.0 per cent or less.
That report also found vacancies rising in 27 regions, mostly on the coast and in regional centres, with Brisbane unchanged. The institute mentioned reports of more broken leases and more tenants moving to cheaper homes. A household priced out of one of the tighter markets has few cheaper private options nearby, which is the pressure Q Shelter's comments point to.
Private owners and property managers are part of this picture too. The 35,500 households the government says it is helping to stay in private rentals live in homes let by ordinary owners, and each tenancy that holds is one application the register never receives.
The July figure, then, records movement in one direction on one measure. It shows the list of eligible applicants is shorter than when the current government took office in October 2024, on the ABC's figures and on the government's. It does not, by itself, separate the effect of new homes from the effect of list management, and it says nothing about renters who fall outside eligibility.
The 2044 target gives a sense of scale. The 4,469 homes the government counts as delivered are about 8 per cent of 53,500, and the 6,925 under way would take the total to 11,394, a little over a fifth, if every one of them counts towards the target. The next published register figure will show whether the decline continues as those homes are completed.