Standard sale contract reissued so buyers can copy authority records

In this article

Written by

Kooky

Builder of Shaka, the payment router that pays every agent their commission on closing date.

About Kooky and Shaka →

The standard contract used for most Queensland home sales changed by a few words on Thursday 1 October 2026. The Queensland Law Society, which publishes the contract jointly with the Real Estate Institute of Queensland, told its members on its contracts page that updated versions of the residential and commercial contracts were to be downloaded from that date, with one clause amended in each.

The amendment is to clause 7.11 of the Contract for the Sale and Purchase of Residential Real Estate and clause 7.10 of its commercial counterpart. In the Society's words, the clauses were changed to clarify that the buyer is authorised to obtain copies of documents held by authorities when inspecting their records. It is a small edit to a clause few buyers ever read, and it touches the part of a purchase where the buyer does their own checking.

Queensland Law Society, REIQ property contracts page, entry for 1 October 2026.

What the notice says

The Society's entry is brief. From 1 October 2026, members are asked to download the updated Word versions of both contracts, each now labelled with the month: the residential contract as "1st edition – October 2026" and the commercial contract in the same way. The edition numbers do not change, the Society says, because the amendments are minor.

Only one change is described. Clause 7.11 of the residential contract and clause 7.10 of the commercial contract now make clear that the authority the seller gives the buyer extends to getting copies of documents, and is not limited to looking at them. The notice gives no further reasons and reports no dispute or court decision behind the edit. It calls the change a clarification, which is the language used when a clause is being made to say plainly what its authors believe it already meant.

The notice does not say anything about contracts signed before 1 October on the earlier wording. Those agreements stand on the terms the parties signed, and nothing in the Society's entry suggests otherwise.

What an authority to inspect is for

Buying a property involves asking several public bodies what they hold about it. A local council has building and plumbing files. Other agencies keep registers that show whether land is affected by a notice, a resumption or a contamination listing. Some of those records are open to anyone who pays a search fee. Others are released only to the owner, or to someone the owner has authorised.

The standard contract deals with that second group in advance. By signing it, the seller authorises the buyer to inspect records about the property held by authorities, so the buyer's solicitor or conveyancer does not have to return to the seller for a signed consent each time a council officer asks for one. The October wording settles a narrow but practical question: whether a buyer relying on that clause may leave with a copy of an approval, a plan or a certificate, or may only read it across a counter. The Society's answer, now written into the clause, is that the buyer may obtain copies.

A copy matters because the records are evidence. A buyer who finds that a deck or a converted garage has no approval on file usually has a short period under the contract to act on what the inspection reports and searches reveal. Advice on that question is easier to give, and a request to the seller is easier to make, with the document in hand.

Why records searches still matter after seller disclosure

Since 1 August 2025, Queensland sellers have had to give buyers a disclosure statement and prescribed certificates before the contract is signed. It would be natural to assume the buyer's own searches matter less now. The published guidance says otherwise.

The Queensland Government's page on the seller disclosure scheme states that a seller does not have to disclose the structural soundness of buildings, a history of flooding or previous approvals. The Law Society's answers to practitioners' questions, published when the scheme began, make the same point about building work: unapproved works need not be disclosed unless a show cause or enforcement notice has been issued, and the disclosure form itself warns buyers to engage a licensed building inspector and to search for whether buildings have the required approvals.

So the disclosure statement tells a buyer about title, zoning and notices, and stops there. Whether the house as it stands matches what the council approved is found in the council's own file. That is the file the reworded clause is about.

How this contract gets updated

The residential contract is young. Proctor, the Law Society's journal, reported in July 2025 that advance copies of two new first-edition contracts had been released for use from 1 August 2025, the day the seller disclosure scheme started. The new residential contract replaced two older documents, the nineteenth edition of the houses and residential land contract and the fifteenth edition of the contract for residential lots in a community titles scheme. The commercial contract merged two documents in the same way.

It has been adjusted before without a new edition number. Proctor reported later in July 2025 that when the contracts were issued in Word format they carried nine amendments each compared with the advance copies released on 1 July 2025, among them a note in the reference schedule that unregistered encumbrances include statutory encumbrances affecting the land. The Society's contracts page also records an update to the related Commercial Tenancy Agreement on 29 October 2025, again without a change of edition.

The first edition was itself written around the disclosure scheme. Proctor's notes on the advance copies describe clause 7.8, which marks the line between the buyer's rights under the Property Law Act and the buyer's rights under the contract: clauses 7.4(1), 7.4(2), 7.5, 7.6(1) and 7.7 do not apply to the extent that a fact has been disclosed in the contract or in the seller disclosure statement. The same notes describe a new item in the reference schedule for lots in a body corporate, under which a buyer may inspect the body corporate's records by a stated date and terminate only if materially prejudiced by what is found. Clause 7.11 belongs to that family of provisions. Each one deals with how a buyer learns about a property and what follows from it.

The October 2026 update follows that pattern: a dated reissue of the same edition, with the month added to the label so that practitioners can tell versions apart. The Society reminds members on the same page that the standard terms should be altered only by adding special conditions, not by editing the printed clauses.

What it means for buyers, sellers and agents

For a buyer, nothing needs to be done. The benefit arrives through whoever handles the conveyance: a search clerk asking a council for a copy of an approval can point to a clause that says so in terms. Buyers who do their own searches get the same footing.

For a seller, the clause has always meant that signing the contract opens the property's public files to the other side. The rewording does not widen what authorities hold or what they may lawfully release under their own rules; it addresses what the seller has consented to. A seller who knows of unapproved work is in the same position as before, and the disclosure rules and the contract's own warranties continue to apply as they did.

For agents and conveyancing practices, the task is housekeeping. Contracts prepared from 1 October should be on the October 2026 version. Agents generate the contract through the REIQ's forms system and solicitors through the Law Society's member downloads, so the two sides of a transaction need to be working from the same text, as with every reissue.

What the notice leaves open

The Society's entry does not say whether particular councils or agencies had been refusing copies to buyers, how often that happened, or whether the change was requested by practitioners. It does not mention any other clause. It announces no second edition and gives no timetable for one.

It also does not change the disclosure scheme. The Property Law Act 2023 and its prescribed form are untouched by an edit to a contract clause. The October reissue is a reminder that the two documents do different jobs: the disclosure statement is what the law requires the seller to hand over before signing, and the contract is where the parties agree how the buyer may go on checking afterwards.

Kooky, from Shaka

Kooky edits Queensland Estate and builds Shaka, the payment router he made for Queensland property professionals. One payment comes in, and every agent, agency and party in the deal receives their signed share on closing date.

About Kooky and Shaka →