How Brisbane 2032 venues get approved: the Games planning shortcut

In this article

Written by

Kooky

Builder of Shaka, the payment router that pays every agent their commission on closing date.

About Kooky and Shaka →

When a stadium, a pool or an athlete village is built for the 2032 Games, there is no development application lodged with the council, no public notification period under the planning scheme and no decision notice to appeal. People who live beside Victoria Park, the Brisbane Showgrounds or the Sunshine Coast Stadium often find this out when the fences go up, and ask a reasonable question: who approved this?

The short answer is that Parliament did, in advance and in bulk. A law passed in June 2025 declares the construction of listed Games venues and villages lawful, despite a long list of State Acts that would otherwise apply. This guide explains what that law says, which Acts it switches off, who makes the decisions in their place, what rules still bind the builders, and what avenues are left for someone who objects. It describes the law in general terms and is not advice on any particular property or dispute.

Planning (Social Impact and Community Benefit) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025; Games Independent Infrastructure and Coordination Authority.

The Act behind the shortcut

The governing law is the Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games Arrangements Act 2021. As its title shows, it dates from 2021, the year Brisbane was confirmed as host on 21 July.

The planning provisions came later. On 1 May 2025 the Queensland Government announced what it called "Games laws", a set of amendments to the 2021 Act. The joint statement from Deputy Premier Jarrod Bleijie and Games Minister Tim Mander said venues, villages and transport infrastructure would be able to proceed lawfully despite provisions of the Queensland Heritage Act, the Planning Act and the Local Government Act, and that the changes would "streamline the approvals process".

The amendments were carried in a wider bill, the Planning (Social Impact and Community Benefit) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2025. The ABC reported on 26 June 2025 that Parliament had passed the legislation, describing it as overriding fifteen planning laws. The Act received assent on 30 June 2025.

The amendments inserted a new chapter into the 2021 Act. Its opening section, 53DA, states the purpose: to facilitate the timely delivery of development for or relating to authority venues, other venues and villages. Everything that follows serves that aim.

What section 53DD actually says

The centre of the scheme is one section, 53DD. It does three things.

First, it declares lawfulness. Development, use or activity covered by the section "is taken to be lawful despite" the Acts it lists.

Second, it deals with the requirements those Acts would normally impose. A requirement under a listed Act is taken to have been complied with, and the provisions that would otherwise apply do not apply.

Third, it limits court action. The section provides that "a civil proceeding arising out of the development, use or activity may not be started to the extent the relief sought would have the direct effect of prohibiting, restricting or limiting the carrying out of the development, use or activity".

The section's reach is defined by what is being built. It applies to development carried out after commencement for the construction of an authority venue, another venue or a village, to the extent the development is for, or relates to, a games-related use. It also applies to what the Act calls games-related transport infrastructure, and to associated uses and activities.

Put simply: if a project is on the Act's lists and is being built for the Games, the ordinary State approval system does not stand in its way.

The fifteen Acts that are set aside

The list in section 53DD is longer than the three Acts named in the Government's announcement. It runs to fifteen.

Each entry removes a different kind of check. The Planning Act is the one most people have met: it is the law under which development applications are lodged, assessed and decided. Setting it aside is what removes the application itself.

The two local government Acts matter because councils make local laws and planning schemes under them. The ABC's report on the passage of the legislation put the effect in one line: final planning sign-off rests with the State Government, not with local councils.

The Queensland Heritage Act is the one that has drawn the most attention, because Victoria Park and Centenary Pool are both places with recognised heritage value. In May 2025 the ABC reported that a director of the State's own environment department had recommended expanding Victoria Park's heritage protection, describing the park as important in demonstrating the evolution of Queensland's early public recreation reserves. With the Heritage Act on the list, a heritage listing does not stop a listed venue being built there.

The environmental group covers clearing of vegetation, protected wildlife, fish habitat, coastal works, pollution controls and the offsets normally required when environmental values are lost. The two water Acts deal with water and sewerage connections and supply.

Which projects are on the lists

The shortcut is not a general exemption for anything described as Olympic. It attaches to projects named in schedules to the Act. The amending Act sets up four of them: authority venues, other venues, villages and games-related transport infrastructure.

Authority venues are the ones delivered by the Games Independent Infrastructure and Coordination Authority, usually called GIICA. The authority's own description of its task is to build seven new venues and upgrade ten existing ones, seventeen in all, and to oversee two further venues being delivered on the Gold Coast.

Its published venue list gives a sense of the spread. The new venues include Brisbane Stadium at Victoria Park in Herston, the National Aquatic Centre at Spring Hill, indoor sports centres at Logan and at Petrie in Moreton Bay, a whitewater centre at Birkdale in the Redlands and a mountain bike centre on the Sunshine Coast. The upgrades include the Queensland Tennis Centre at Tennyson, the Chandler sports precinct, Sunshine Coast Stadium at Kawana, Barlow Park in Cairns, the Toowoomba Showgrounds and the flatwater course on the Fitzroy River at Rockhampton.

Villages are the athlete villages. The 2032 Delivery Plan, published by the Queensland Government in March 2025, places them at the Brisbane Showgrounds in Bowen Hills, at Royal Pines on the Gold Coast, in the Maroochydore city centre and in Rockhampton.

The words "to the extent the development is for, or in relation to, a games-related use" are a limit worth noticing. The section is tied to building for the Games. It is not written as a permanent planning holiday for whatever is later done with the land.

Who decides in place of the council

If no assessment manager is weighing an application, the decisions about what gets built, where on the site and when are made inside government.

GIICA was established in November 2024. Its first job was the 100 Day Review of Games infrastructure, which led to the Delivery Plan released on 25 March 2025. Under the amended Act its main functions include seeking funding allocations, delivering authority venues, monitoring other venues and ensuring compliance with the Games agreements. The Act describes the task as delivering venues "in time for the games".

The money is a control in its own right. The seventeen venues are funded from a $7.1 billion program shared by the Australian and Queensland governments under an intergovernmental agreement, and the Delivery Plan notes that venues delivered through GIICA require government approvals under the terms of that agreement. A venue that is lawful under section 53DD still has to be funded, and funding decisions belong to ministers of two governments.

The 1 May 2025 statement also describes the coordination machinery set up by the amendments: a Games Coordination Plan prepared by the Department of Sport, a Transport and Mobility Strategy prepared by Transport and Main Roads, and a Games Leadership Group for oversight. The same amendments cut the organising committee's board from 24 directors to 15, a recommendation of the 100 Day Review.

The practical result is that the questions a council planner would normally ask, about height, traffic, noise, overshadowing or loss of open space, are answered by the delivery body and its designers, within a budget set by governments. The authority publishes its venues' status in phases: planning and approvals, design, early works, construction, commissioning and handover.

The rules that still apply

The shortcut is wide, but several things sit outside it.

Building standards are the first. Section 53DE provides that building work for authority venues and other venues must comply with the relevant provisions under the Building Act 1975. Structural safety, fire safety and the other technical standards that sit under that Act are not waived.

Villages are treated a little more strictly. Under section 53DF, where building work for a village would be assessable development under schedule 9 of the Planning Regulation 2017, a development permit is required. That is a narrow doorway back into the ordinary system for the building-work aspect of housing that will be lived in after the Games.

Commonwealth law is the second area. A Queensland Act can set aside Queensland Acts; the list in section 53DD contains only State legislation. The Games authority's page for Brisbane Stadium records that a referral under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act has been submitted for the project, and a page on the Premier's website dated 1 June 2026 refers to a federal environmental clearance in the preceding month.

The third is everything not on the list. Work health and safety law, for example, is not among the fifteen Acts.

Cultural heritage has its own track

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage is handled separately from the fifteen Acts. The amendments do not simply switch the cultural heritage Acts off. Part 3 of the new chapter, sections 53DG to 53DW, replaces the usual process with an alternative one.

In outline, the person carrying out the development, called the proponent, sends a negotiation proposal to the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander parties for the project area. Those parties are identified using the meaning given in the existing cultural heritage Acts. A party that wants to take part responds with a participation notice and becomes a negotiating party. The proponent and the negotiating parties then have a negotiation period in which to agree a cultural heritage management plan for the project, which the Act calls a part 3 plan.

If no plan is agreed, the Act supplies one: a default plan set out in schedule 5 applies instead. Either way a plan exists at the end of the period, and under section 53DH a person who carries out the development in accordance with the part 3 plan does not commit an offence under the cultural heritage Acts.

The design choice is plain: negotiation is required, but it cannot hold up the project indefinitely, because the default plan takes over. This guide does not set out the time limits for each stage; anyone who needs them should read part 3 of the Act itself.

How well this works for the people it concerns is disputed. The ABC has reported protests at Victoria Park over the site's cultural and historic significance to Indigenous people, with arrests in 2026.

Review rights: what is closed, what is left

Under the ordinary planning system, a decision on a development application is a formal step that can be appealed or challenged. Section 53DD changes the position for Games projects in two ways.

The first is indirect. With the Planning Act set aside, there is no development application, so there is no submission, no decision notice and no appeal that flows from one.

The second is direct. Subsection (3) says a civil proceeding arising out of the development may not be started to the extent that the relief sought would have the direct effect of prohibiting, restricting or limiting the development, use or activity.

The wording is specific. It is aimed at court orders that would stop or cut back the work. How far it reaches in a particular case, and what kinds of claim fall outside it, are questions for lawyers and courts, and this guide does not try to answer them. The ABC reported on 28 May 2026 that residents were planning a court challenge to the Victoria Park stadium.

What plainly remains is political and administrative. The projects are funded through budgets that Parliament votes on. The authority is a public body created by the State and answerable to it. And the State has chosen to consult on some of the surrounding decisions, even though the Act does not make that a condition of building.

Where the public still gets a say

Consultation on Games projects exists, but it is a matter of policy, not a statutory step that must be passed.

The clearest current example is the Victoria Park Precinct Draft Legacy Plan. The Government opened it for comment on 3 August 2026, with a closing date of 27 September. It covers the parkland, paths and public spaces around the stadium and the aquatic centre. It does not reopen whether those venues are built.

Transport projects linked to the Games have run their own rounds. The Department of Transport and Main Roads records consultation on a draft Public Environment Report for The Wave rail line on the Sunshine Coast between July and November 2025.

At site level, GIICA publishes construction notices and runs a free 24-hour phone line. Those are channels for information and complaints about how work is carried out, not for objecting to whether it is.

The bill itself went through Parliament's usual process, including public submissions. Whether those were heeded is contested: Queensland Conservation Council director Dave Copeman told the ABC the Government "had ignored hundreds of submissions".

The case for and the case against

The Government's argument is about time. The Games open on 23 July 2032, a date that cannot move. Mr Bleijie called the laws "vital for Games delivery", and the Government's statements return repeatedly to days lost before the Delivery Plan was settled. The argument is that an ordinary process, with its assessment and appeal stages, could not be relied on to finish in time.

The critics' argument is about precedent and about particular places. Mr Copeman described the legislation as "a flashback to the Campbell Newman era". Andrea Lunt of the Save Victoria Park group told the ABC the park "is too important to lose". David Hinchliffe, of the same group, said of the heritage recommendation that the Government should listen to its own department.

Both things can be true at once. A fixed deadline is a real constraint, and the checks that were removed existed for reasons. The Act resolves the tension in favour of the deadline, for a defined list of projects and a defined purpose.

What this means if you live or own nearby

A few general points follow for owners, tenants and buyers near a Games site.

Do not expect a development application to appear on the council's register for the venue itself. The place to look is the Games authority's venue pages and construction notices, and the State's delivery website.

The shortcut covers the listed projects. A private development next door, such as an apartment building on land near a venue, is not a Games venue and goes through the ordinary planning system, unless some other State mechanism applies to that land.

Heritage or vegetation protection on a listed site does not have its usual force against a Games project. It keeps its force for other development.

Building work on venues still has to meet the Building Act, and the working hours, access changes and haulage arrangements for each site are set out by the delivery body, not by a planning condition.

Anyone considering legal action should take advice early, because the Act limits the proceedings that can be started. And anyone with a view on what the surrounding parkland or precinct should become has, at least in the case of Victoria Park, a consultation open until 27 September 2026 in which to say so.

Kooky, from Shaka

Kooky edits Queensland Estate and builds Shaka, the payment router he made for Queensland property professionals. One payment comes in, and every agent, agency and party in the deal receives their signed share on closing date.

About Kooky and Shaka →